The CSC Participation Agreement: An Institutional Surrender of Sovereignty & the Bureaucratic Overreach of the New College Sports Commission
Lee Walpole Lassiter, Esq. Lee Walpole Lassiter, Esq.

The CSC Participation Agreement: An Institutional Surrender of Sovereignty & the Bureaucratic Overreach of the New College Sports Commission

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In the wake of the House v. NCAA settlement, the "Power Four" conferences have birthed a new enforcement entity: the College Sports Commission (CSC). Ostensibly designed to regulate Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) markets and revenue sharing, the CSC has issued an 11-page "University Participation Agreement."

This “Participation Agreement” is not merely a regulatory framework; it is a capitulation. It demands that collegiate institutions sign away fundamental legal rights, submit to an unelected centralized authority, and police their own boosters and student-athletes as agents of this new bureaucracy. It represents a stunning consolidation of power that violates the spirit of American federalism, due process, and free enterprise.

Read More
The NIL Tip Line — When Compliance Goes Confidential
Lee Walpole Lassiter, Esq. Lee Walpole Lassiter, Esq.

The NIL Tip Line — When Compliance Goes Confidential

The College Sports Commission (CSC) has launched the first confidential whistleblower hotline for Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, allowing athletes, staff, boosters, and fans to report suspected violations anonymously. As NIL deals and financial stakes grow, this tip line aims to strengthen oversight and accountability, protect athletes, and signal stricter regulation for boosters and collectives. The CSC reviews reports confidentially and can take actions such as investigating, freezing funds, or working with schools. This development marks a shift toward treating college sports as a regulated economic sector, with an emphasis on transparency, compliance, and due diligence for all parties involved. 

Read More