NIL COLLECTIVES ON TRIAL — WHO REALLY PAYS? 
Lee Walpole Lassiter, Esq. Lee Walpole Lassiter, Esq.

NIL COLLECTIVES ON TRIAL — WHO REALLY PAYS? 

The article discusses the rise of NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) rights in college sports, highlighting the initial enthusiasm for athletes profiting freely, which has since led to instability due to poorly regulated collectives. These collectives, often working closely with universities, face legal issues from unfulfilled promises and questionable deals, exemplified by the Jaden Rashada case. Regulators now enforce stricter rules to prevent pay-for-play schemes, and schools are establishing official NIL channels to mitigate liability. Athletes are advised to verify funds and clear contractual terms before entering agreements. Despite challenges, NIL collectives are expected to persist and evolve, emphasizing the need for accountability and careful oversight in the future.

Read More
The $13.85 Million NIL Mirage — What the Jaden Rashada Lawsuit Really Means 
Lee Walpole Lassiter, Esq. Lee Walpole Lassiter, Esq.

The $13.85 Million NIL Mirage — What the Jaden Rashada Lawsuit Really Means 

Five-star quarterback Jaden Rashada’s $13.85 million NIL deal with the Florida Gators collapsed before any payments were made, exposing the risky and uncertain nature of college athlete contracts. Rashada is now suing Florida’s head coach, a top booster, and the Gator Collective for allegedly making promises they couldn’t keep, with the case moving forward in federal court. The lawsuit highlights major legal questions about NIL deals and could force schools and collectives to adopt stricter safeguards, such as proof of funds and legal oversight. The message for athletes and agents is clear: verify deals before signing, as the age of easy promises in college sports is ending.

Read More
NIL Revenue Sharing — The $20 Million Shift
Lee Walpole Lassiter, Esq. Lee Walpole Lassiter, Esq.

NIL Revenue Sharing — The $20 Million Shift

Summary: This blog examines the evolving landscape of college athlete compensation following the introduction of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights and the House v. NCAA settlement, which now allows schools to share millions in revenue with athletes. While payments are largely concentrated in high-profile sports, the shift creates significant financial, transparency, and legal challenges for athletic departments, especially regarding revenue generation, equity, and compliance with Title IX.

Watch Michael’s Fast Break here: https://youtube.com/shorts/sI5NImvd8Ik?feature=share

Read More